Globalization is one of the most contested critical concepts of our time, simultaneously lauded for having democratizing effects and decried for creating even greater inequities across the globe. Largely understood in terms of economic and political processes, globalization is nonetheless often invoked through consumer and cultural images. Our collective goal will be to chart critical genealogies of the term, and its associated vocabulary, so that individually students might articulate their own theoretical orientation towards the term and consider how processes of globalization affect their own critical and creative practices. Given the shear scale of the phenomenon that globalization seeks to describe, we might ask when we study globalization what isn’t our subject? In order to make our study manageable, our course goals will be twofold: to become familiar with some of the foundational texts within globalization studies and to think about how those concepts are enlisted to discuss the effects of globalization on culture and land.
This course will allow students to help students in the following SLOs:
- Through our interdisciplinary focus, we will gain a greater “understanding of the discipline of English and its relationship to other disciplines.”
- Through written and oral assignments, you will develop your “ability to demonstrate advanced critical analysis in both written and oral formats”
- By creating genealogies of the terms common within the vocabulary of globalization, you will develop your ability “to map, historicize and contextualize” critical discourse.
The course is divided into three sections.
Part I: Definitions and Key Words
Our discussion will focus on definitions of globalization, and other concepts such as “deterritorialization,” “hybridity,” “diaspora,” “cosmopolitanism,” “neo-liberalism,” “flow,” and “the planetary.” To give one example, the work of Arjun Appadurai of the flow of people, goods and media across the globe is central to the study of globalization and diaspora, but Appadurai’s work itself is indebted to Giles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s discussion of “deterritorialization.” We will read, therefore, these works in concert with each other and consider as well recent critiques of these concepts issued from particular locations, including the Pacific.
Part II: Globalization and Culture
In this section, we will consider how the economic and political realm affects culture. To do this, we will read Bret Benjamin’s Invested Interests: Capital, Culture and the World Bank, which analyzes the kinds of investments in literature and culture that the World Bank, one of the most controversial of global institutions, professed from its very origins. We will think about the tropes and narrative devices that are used to represent globalization in contemporary films and will consider how economic crises are represented as global phenomenon in a number of documentaries.
Part III: Globalization, Land and Borders
This final section will focus on the effects of globalization on land and conceptions of governance and territoriality. In addition to thinking about environmental degradation, like global warming, and alternative projects like sustainability, we will also consider how globalization has affected human relationships to land. We will also discuss the critiques that indigenous people, including Native Hawaiians, have made against globalization. If globalization is often characterized by deterritorialization, what implications does that have for native peoples whose claims often rest on ties to quite specific lands and who do not necessarily aspire to ideas of a borderless world? In addition to these questions we will consider what impact does the rendering of land as commodity (real estate) have on the survivial of indigenous people? How do we understand these social movements in relation to other activist projects that are attempting to undo national sovereignty and create rights-based discourses aimed at dismantling borders?
Assignments: Class presentation (15%), weekly posts to laulima site (15%), 10-page paper (30%) due at midterm that explores the critical genealogy of a key term used in globalization discourse and relating that concept to a literary text, film or other cultural text; this paper may serve as the basis for the final seminar paper of 20-25 pages (50%).
Required Texts: Invested Interests: Capital, Culture and the World Bank, Bret Benjamin; Paradigm Wars: Indigenous Peoples’ Resistance to Globalization, eds. Jerry Mander and Victoria Tauli-Corpuz; Land’s End: Capitalism on an Indigenous Frontier, Tania Murray Li; Seed Sovereignty, Food Security Vandana Shiva; Globalization and Culture: Cultural Melange, Jan Nederveen Pieterse; Films: Babel, , Noho Hewa, An Inconvenient Truth, Inside Job Novels: _A Hologram for the King, Dave Eggers;Tales of the Tikongs, Epeli Hau’ofa; How to Get Filthy Rich in Rising Asia, Mohsin Hamid; and a Course Reader with additional works by: Arjun Appardurai, Homi Bhabha, Purnima Bose, Timothy Brennan, Mike Davis, David Graeber, Deleuze and Guattari, Thomas Friedman, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, David Harvey, Neville Hoad, ku‘ualoha ho‘omanawanui, Anne Keala Kelly, S. Krishna, Karl Marx, Masao Miyoshi, Aihwa Ong, Arundhati Roy, Saskia Sassen, Amartya Sen, S. Shankar, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Manfred Steger, Joseph Stiglitz, Rob Wilson (among others).
Laura E. Lyons is Chair of the Department of English. With Purnima Bose, she co-edited the collection Cultural Critique and the Global Corporation (Indiana UP, 2010) and a 2014 special issue of Biography on “Corporate Personhood and Lifewriting,” and with Cynthia Franklin she has published a number of articles on testimony, most recently in a forthcoming issue of GLQ: Gay and Lesbian Quarterly and co-edited a special issue of Biography on “Personal Effects: the Testimonial Uses of Life Writing.”